« The best route forward on Iran (and nukes) | Main | Save the sea-level dwellings? »

What's it take to get some regionalization?

ARTICLE: Clinton Arrival in Pakistan Met by Fatal Attacks, By MARK LANDLER and ISMAIL KHAN, New York Times, October 28, 2009

With the Obama team continuing Bush-Cheney's lack of strategic imagination in regionalizing the solution set on Afghanistan (no worries, as the Chinese solution plugs along--investment by investment--in both sides of the Af-Pak divide), there is plenty of logic behind backing the horse most willing right now to take the fight directly to the enemy.

The Biden redirect in action, with the Pakistani desire for no American "face" being most welcome--casualty wise.

Comments (1)

These attacks seem slightly odd to me, not the timing but the direct assault on civilian. not that attacking civilians is new for terrorists but the recent manual on ops by the Taliban has noted that attacks on civilians are to be avoided, they don't help the hearts and minds bit.

Post a comment

Comments must adhere to the comment policy. All TypeKey comments will post immediately (but are still subject to moderation) All other comments must wait for moderation before they publish. Please also read How to write so Tom will post/reply.

'Development-in-a-Box' is a registered trademark of Enterra Solutions.

Buy Tom's books online









About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 7, 2009 4:33 AM.

The previous post in this blog was The best route forward on Iran (and nukes).

The next post in this blog is Save the sea-level dwellings?.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.