« Multiplying nations in the Gap | Main | Krugman on China and the dollar »

The winning entry: Tramadol

Started it yesterday and it was like flipping a switch from screwed-up to normal: ate normal, got tired normal, slept normal (no weird dreams), felt hungry in a normal way when I got up (no nausea), and felt rested when I got up (instead of just plain scared). In short, a drug that truly promotes recovery instead of just holding the line on pain. The downside is minor: the slightest fuzz that is very easy for me to navigate and punch through as required for thinking (like a semi-bad allergy late-afternoon).

Non-narcotic, centrally-acting analgesic, Tramadol goes by many names.

It's calling card: it mimics the actions of opioids (they call it a "stripped down version" synthetic version of Codeine) but, in chemical terms, does not belong to that class.

What I know: it masks the pain very effectively and produces a mild sense of euphoria but something way short of the fuzzy elevation you get with the codeine derivatives. And the side-effect of depressed breathing is negligible--for me at least, whereas it was profound for the Vicoden/Percocet/etc. Ditto for any itchiness, constipation, etc.--all too mild to mention.

I only wish I had had it from the start. Would have made for a much easier weekend.

Full script name of what I got is Tramadol HCL 50MG Tablet TEV (4/day as needed for pain).

If you're somebody who doesn't handle the stronger stuff well (like me), this is a nice alternative worth asking for.

I learned this trick with Emily many years ago during her cancer fight: central-acting analgesics often fill in nicely for the harder stuff (morphine gave her frightening post-surgical seizures) and can be most effective for navigating scary invasive procedures.

I post this simply to create a reminder for years from now, when I say to myself, "What was that stuff that worked so well?"

NOTE: THERE IS A LOT OF DEBATE ONLINE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT TRAMADOL IS LEGITIMATELY CONSIDERED A "NARCOTIC." WHAT SEEMS CLEAR: IT IS ADDICTING AT HIGH DOSES AND IS OFTEN ABUSED AS SUCH BY ADDICTS TRYING TO REDUCE DEPENDENCE ON OPIOIDS. LIKE ALL PAIN MEDS, IT IS TO BE USED AT A MINIMUM LEVEL AND FOR THE SHORTEST TIME POSSIBLE. I DO NOT WANT TO GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT ITS DANGER-FREE, BECAUSE IT SO MIMICS THE ACTION OF OPIOIDS THAT MANY PROFESSIONALS CONSIDER IT TO BE THE SAME, AND THUS A NARCOTIC. I JUST KNOW THAT, FOR ME, IT REGISTERS AT A LEVEL WAY BELOW THE VICODINS AND PERCOCETS AND CODEINE PRODUCTS, SO IT WAS A REAL HELP,

Comments (4)

Good to know an alternative. The side effects of Vicodin (especially the weird, weird dreams it gives me) I try and avoid like the plague. Thanks for this, Tom.

Thanks from me as well. Can especially relate on the weird dreams thing.

Glad it is working for you, but you should still know that it is an opioid/narcotic.

Kenneth,

Google it and you'll find plenty of debate on that subject, with the majority saying no. My doc also said no.

I guess it depends on how you judge the "synthetic, stripped-down" definitions.

Doesn't mean it can't be addicting, though.

Post a comment

Comments must adhere to the comment policy. All TypeKey comments will post immediately (but are still subject to moderation) All other comments must wait for moderation before they publish. Please also read How to write so Tom will post/reply.

'Development-in-a-Box' is a registered trademark of Enterra Solutions.

Buy Tom's books online









About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 3, 2009 11:12 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Multiplying nations in the Gap.

The next post in this blog is Krugman on China and the dollar.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.